Frame vs. Quicksilver - Please help me save Frame

[Ridder, Fred]

I'd almost guarantee that for 80% of the Interleaf users, the only
factor that really matters is that they don't have to change what
they've been doing for the last dozen years.  They've got a lot of
time and energy invested on making it second nature to use a 
tool that most people consider arcane. They simply don't want
to forced to change to *any* other tool that might involve a similar 
learning curve. The more difficult a tool was to learn, the more 
likely it is that proficient users will be strongly averse to adopting
a new tool (unless they are tool geeks like me...)

My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel.
Fred Ridder (fred dot ridder at intel dot com)
Intel
Parsippany, NJ

-----Original Message-----
From: framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel.com at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Glenn Voyles
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:17 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Frame vs. Quicksilver - Please help me save Frame

We've heard a lot about how much better FM is than IL, and I don't doubt
any of it. Great points.

But wouldn't the IL side of the house be building a case as well? I'm
curious what justification they claim for their cause. 

Glenn