Frame vs Arbortext

Steve Rickaby srickaby at wordmongers.demon.co.uk
Fri Apr 27 02:19:00 PDT 2007


At 11:46 -0700 26/4/07, Matt Sullivan wrote:

>These days, Frame can work directly with the XML, and storing as .fm is
>strictly optional. IMO, this undercuts much of AT's sales pitch.

If the [fairly imminent?] upcoming version of FrameMaker actually turns out to be FrameMaker 8 and not FrameMaker 7.2-and-a-bit, it seems likely that the developments will lean heavily in the direction of XML support, and this will further erode what different currently exists.

-- 
Steve



More information about the framers mailing list