FW: Faster scrolling
Robert Stoker
info at seatechpubs.com
Thu Jun 7 09:35:39 PDT 2007
Natalie,
What operating system are you using?
What version of FrameMaker are you using?
Are you working across a network?
If yes, what flavor of server do you use?
We have a similar issue with the WIndows version of FrameMaker. In the
past, people have suggested turning off the graphics to speed
navigation through a document. Others have suggested a fast hard drive,
a lot of RAM, and a fast network connection (if you are working across
the network). Turning off the graphics is not always convenient for an
author, and fast equipment may not help. Below is some information I
have compiled about scrolling speed, operating systems, and servers.
We did some speed tests to determine the efficiency of various machines
we have. We tested a MacBook Pro, a G5 Mac, and a HP Pavilion. We have
a 1 GB network. The test consisted of scrolling through 10 pages of a
typical document. Each page contains text and three-to-five photos
(sized at 3.25"X2.0" and 300 dpi tif) with vector callouts placed on
top of the photos in an outside application. The graphics are saved in
the outside application as EPS with a low resolution TIF preview. The
resulting EPS files are about 1 MB each. We import the EPS files into
FrameMaker by reference. All FrameMaker files and graphics are located
on a server. We performed the test with files located on a Mac server
and on a Windows server.
NOTE: The following discussion is not a Mac vs PC issue. The reality
is that we need to work with the Windows version of Frame in the
future, and we need to make it as efficient and cost effective as
possible.
The results of the speed tests show that the G5 Mac significantly
outperformed any of the WIndows configurations, independent of the
server. The MacBook Pro running Parallels, the MacBook Pro operating
under Boot Camp, and the HP have unacceptable performance with the Mac
server. The MacBook Pro in both configurations has marginal performance
with the Windows server. (If the graphics are stored on the local hard
drive, the performance of the WIndows version of Frame improves but is
still only marginally acceptable. However, local work is not a
possibility—we must work across the network.)
We did more research to determine why the Windows version of Frame is
so much slower. We ran a process-monitoring utility and found the
following: when FrameMaker for WIndows displays a graphic, Frame
requests the graphic information 1Kb at a time. The Windows version of
Frame completely loads the full resolution graphic and then accesses
the preview facet. We couldn't find a similar process-monitoring
utility for the Mac, but it seems that the Mac version of Frame must
display graphics differently than the Windows version. If there is a
way to change the Windows behavior, we should be able to significantly
improve the performance of the Windows version of Frame with our Mac
server. Does anyone know how to change this?
The unfortunate conclusion is that if we can't improve the PC-to-Mac
server communication, we will eventually need to change to a Windows
server. This is a significant cost increase—buying a new server machine
(we have the Win2K server on the HP notebook for development purposes
only), managing a Windows server, and the decrease in productivity all
add up.
Here are the actual results of the speed tests:
Server 1: Mac G5
Processor: Dual 2GHz Power PC
RAM: 1.5GB
Operating system: Mac OS 10.4.9 Server
Hard drive speed: 7200 RPM
Server 2: HP Pavilion notebook (development server)
Processor: 1.66 GHz Intel Centrino Duo
RAM: 1.5GB
Operating system: Windows 2000 Server
Hard drive speed : 7200 RPM
Test machine 1: MacBook Pro
Processor: 2GHz Intel Core Duo
RAM: 2GB
Operating system: Mac OS 10.4.9 running Windows XP Pro through Parallels
FrameMaker version: 7.2
Time to scroll through 10 pages on G5 server: 3 min. 31 sec.
Time to scroll through 10 pages on Win2K server: 36 sec.
Test machine 2: MacBook Pro
Processor: 2GHz Intel Core Duo
RAM: 2GB
Operating system: Windows XP Pro through Boot Camp
FrameMaker version: 7.2
Time to scroll through 10 pages on G5 server: 2 min. 10 sec.
Time to scroll through 10 pages on Win2K server: 35 sec.
Test machine 3: HP Pavilion
Processor: 1.66 GHz Intel Centrino Duo
RAM: 1.5GB
Operating system: Windows 2000 Server
FrameMaker version: 7.2
Time to scroll through 10 pages on G5 server: 1 min. 43 sec.
Time to scroll through 10 pages on Win2K server: n/a this is the Win2K
server machine
Test machine 4: Mac G5
Processor: 1.8GHz Dual Power PC
RAM: 1GB
Operating system: Mac OS 10.3.7
FrameMaker version: 7.0
Time to scroll through 10 pages on G5 server: 13 sec.
Time to scroll through 10 pages on Win2K server: 13 sec.
Regards,
Robert Stoker
Seatech Publications, Inc.
Content Development,
FrameMaker Plug-ins, and
Product Information Management Systems
www.seatechpubs.com
Phone: 360-394-1911
-----Original Message-----
From: framers-bounces+bgagne=husky.ca at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+bgagne=husky.ca at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf
Of Natalie Bircher
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:38 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FW: Faster scrolling
We have graphic-intensive docs and it takes forever to scroll through
the doc. Is there a way to speed things up?
Natalie Bircher
Technical Writer
BackStreet Media
Phone: 320-843-4337
Fax: 320-842-4236
Email: <mailto:natalieb at backstreetmedia.com>
natalieb at backstreetmedia.com
More information about the framers
mailing list