Basic question about Structured Frame

[Bodvar Bjorgvinsson]

Simple answer is to question #1: Yes.

BUT: you need to prepare this carefully. For question #2: Maybe look
into the DITA. This is not a decision to take before you have looked
into the current structure of your manuals and try to see from that
standpoint what you would be able to gain from the change.

Me, I am using both Structured and unstructure FM depending on the
type of manuals. In either type there is very little use for content
reuse. We could set it up, but it would probably take much more
resources and extra software (and maybe staff) to run.

Bodvar

On 3/13/07, Rick Spiegel <spiegel at abinitio.com> wrote:
> My company is considering switching to Structured Frame to solve our
> current problems with content reuse, and I have a question, the answer to
> which, to me, holds the key as to whether or not Structured Frame is the
> answer we're looking for. I would appreciate it if anyone with experience
> in using Structured Frame could respond to this question.
>
> The question is this: if our documents were authored in Structured Frame,
> could we use the same topic at a heading 1 level in one document and at a
> heading 2 level in another document? If so, in a very general way (no need
> to write a small book!) how does this work?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
>
> Rick Spiegel
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as bodvar at gmail.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/bodvar%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>