Footnote Out of Sequence

[Pinkham, Jim]

No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :) 

-----Original Message-----
From: knowhowpro at gmail.com [mailto:knowhowpro at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Gold
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Art Campbell; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Footnote Out of Sequence

Hi, Jim:

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim <Jim.Pinkham at voith.com>
wrote:
> Hi, Peter --
>
> Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three 
> are fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference 
> technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the marked-up 
> manual I'm revising, was that the final footnote would be a 3, not a 
> 1. Based on Art's comment, the 1 is apparently what should be expected

> because it is a new table. If there's another way to get to 3 for the 
> final note, in addition to the approach Art suggested, I'd be 
> interested to learn about it and consider going that route.

Unless it's possible to fake the two tables as a single table, I'm out
of ideas.

Regards,

Peter
__________________
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices