FM 7.0 and Acrobat 9
Fred Ridder
docudoc at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 16 05:54:37 PDT 2009
Thanks for clarifying this shortcoming of the print to PDF method, Shlomo.
Now that you mention it, I do recall having heard about it. But since it has been years since I was called upon to produce a multiple PDF set from a single book, it hasn't been an issue for me and I apparently didn't invest any effort in remembering it. Now I will.
-Fred Ridder
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:18:07 +0300
> To: docudoc at hotmail.com
> From: shlomo2 at microtype.com
> Subject: RE: FM 7.0 and Acrobat 9
> CC: Framers at FrameUsers.com
>
> Fred,
>
> You wrote:
>
> >Umm, the discussion is not about "print to PDF", which is actually the
> >method that several of us have been recommending all along. ...
>
> This method may produce decent results when a book is printed to a single
> PDF file, but it fails when a book is printed to multiple PDF (each chapter
> becoming a separate PDF).
> Cross-file links are generated properly, pointing to the expected
> chapter.PDF files; but the PDF files are named differently (with a book
> name prefix), and therefore all cross-file links are bad.
>
> For example, the sample ecology book included with FrameMaker generates the
> following PDFs when "printed to PDF" as multiple PDFs:
> ecology.book(ecologyTOC.pdf
> ecology.book(resource.pdf
> ecology.book(concern.pdf
> ecology.book(response.pdf
> ecology.book(ecologyIX.pdf
>
>
> Shlomo Perets
>
> MicroType * http://www.microtype.com
> FrameMaker/Acrobat training & consulting * FM-to-Acrobat TimeSavers/Assistants
More information about the framers
mailing list