Framemaker installed under Administrator

[Scott White]

Ok I just got off the phone with this guy. He doesn't like my  
suggestions, Art's suggestion or anyone else's.
He wants to control what gets installed and downloaded on a machine so  
he wants to do all installs and downloads as administrator rights. He  
doesn't want to give this person administrator rights to run the  
software in fear this person will download other things.
He installed photoshop and InDesign under these rules and they will  
open up for the user rights. It's just Frame that won't. He wants me  
to get with Adobe and have them fix this or get answers to his problem.

He just sent me a log dissertation on why windows administrators must  
do what they are doing -- make everything tighter than bark on a tree.

Any other help appreciated.



Scott White
Media Production & EBC Manager
Implementation Coordinator
210-704-8239
swhite at alamark.com


-------------- next part --------------

On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Art Campbell wrote:

> He's not locked in. If he activated, he can de-activate before
> uninstalling, and he's good to move the software anywhere -- including
> back on to the same machine.
>
> Another easier way to go may be to give the user Admin privileges, so
> she can execute FM.
>
> Art Campbell
>               art.campbell at gmail.com
>  "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
> Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
>                                                      No disclaimers  
> apply.
>                                                               DoD 358
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Scott White <swhite at alamark.com>  
> wrote:
>> IF that is the case, can it be uninstalled and reinstalled for  
>> multiusers or
>> is he locked in?
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott White
>> Media Production & EBC Manager
>> Implementation Coordinator
>> 210-704-8239
>> swhite at alamark.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Art Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> That was exactly what I was thinking -- installed "For Just This  
>>> User"
>>> instead of "All Users."
>>>
>>> But I suspect you might also be able to fix it if the Admin account
>>> twiddles the directory permissions (recursively) to allow Everyone  
>>> to
>>> execute the Frame directories.
>>>
>>> Art
>>>
>>> Art Campbell
>>>              art.campbell at gmail.com
>>>  "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
>>> Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
>>>                                                     No disclaimers  
>>> apply.
>>>                                                              DoD 358
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Scott White <swhite at alamark.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can check on that. Interesting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scott White
>>>> Media Production & EBC Manager
>>>> Implementation Coordinator
>>>> 210-704-8239
>>>> swhite at alamark.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:03 AM, O'Laoghaire Micheal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible that when your client installed Frame he chose  
>>>>> "single
>>>>> user" instead of "multiple user"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Micheal O'Laoghaire
>>>>> Billing and Active Customer Management
>>>>> Comverse Inc.
>>>>> Wakefield, MA
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>