Benchmarking: Save as PDF in FM9 vs. FM8

Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 06:05:57 PST 2010


Because you're using SaveAs, which in FM 9 has it's own processes and
job option switches.

If you run each by printing to the Acrobat logical printer and select
the same job options, I suspect the numbers will be comparable.

Art Campbell
               art.campbell at gmail.com
  "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
                                                      No disclaimers apply.
                                                               DoD 358



On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Yves Barbion <yves.barbion at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi group
>
> I've done the following test in FM9 and 8: save 74-page book as PDF. These
> are the results:
>
> FM9:
> Acrobat Distiller starts after: 1 min. 40 s
> PDF displayed in Acrobat after: 2 min. 59 s
>
> FM8:
> Acrobat Distiller starts after: 18 (!) s
> PDF displayed in Acrobat after: 1 min. 23 s
>
> I've tested this a couple of times and I got similar results.
>
> Does anyone have any idea why FM9 is so much slower?
>
>
>
> Yves Barbion
> www.scripto.nu
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as art.campbell at gmail.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>



More information about the framers mailing list