why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

[Fred Ridder]

I'm curious about one thing (well, more than just one; but one thing in the current context...): 
Has Adobe ever actually said that they use FrameMaker produce the FrameMaker documentation? 

I know that Microsoft has never made any such statement about the MS Word documentation, and for years there have been two persistent rumors about this; one is that they use a proprietary in-house tool or system, and another is that they use FrameMaker. 

-FR

> From: craigede at hotmail.com
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation	totally	revamped
> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:19:05 -0600
> 
> They walk around while reading the help docs created in Framemaker. Sorry if
> I was unclear. The proof of concept is that FM can be used to create this
> sort of documentation.
> 
> Craig
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:48 PM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation
> totally revamped
> 
> Nobody walks around while using FrameMaker.
> 
> My guess is they chose Responsive HTML over WebHelp for the same reason they
> dropped topics, used larger type and screen shots, added page breaks, and
> posted a URL to pages not visible to the public.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Craig Ede <craigede at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I think this is probably a proof of concept issue. I worked for a 
> > packaging machine making company that would love to be able to have 
> > their manuals available to operators as they walked around their machines
> ...

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers-frameusers.com/attachments/20141216/c18b2d4b/attachment.htm>