Frame's future @ Mac/UNIX

[Chris Borokowski]

I should've known that. Thanks for an informative
summary!

--- Dov Isaacs <isaacs at adobe.com> wrote:

> Although MacOS X has UNIX underpinnings, the
> difficult
> stuff relating to user interfaces, font access,
> output,
> etc. is all exclusive to MacOS X and has no real
> similarity
> to Solaris, the other platform on which FrameMaker
> is still
> supported (other than Windows). And of course, you
> have
> differences in processor instruction sets (Sun's
> processors
> versus Gx or Mactel).
> 
> 	- Dov
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Borokowski
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:39 AM
> > To: Free Framers List;
> framers at lists.frameusers.com
> > Subject: Re: Frame's future @ Mac/UNIX
> > 
> > It is possible I'm wholly clueless here. Although
> > rare, it does occur.
> > 
> > Mac OSX is a Mach/BSD hybrid. Wouldn't that enable
> you
> > to use the UNIX version of FrameMaker?
> > 
> > If not, have you considered Linux?
> > 
> > --- Paul Findon <pfindon at infopage.net> wrote:
> > > One of our frustrations is
> > > that there is no  
> > > FrameMaker alternative on the Mac.
> 


http://www.dionysius.com
code | tech | docs | leadership


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front