Fwd: Graphics in FM

[Deirdre Reagan]

Sorry if this is a repost -- I got an autogenerated message that this
post DIED before it reached it's destination.

"I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

<framers at lists.frameusers.com>: Command died with status 1:"


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Deirdre Reagan <deirdre.reagan at gmail.com>
Date: Oct 9, 2008 2:43 PM
Subject: Graphics in FM
To: Framer's List <framers at lists.frameusers.com>


Hi all!

FM 8.0, Windows XP.

In my documents, we use black and white line drawings exclusively.

I've been cutting and pasting 200 pixels / inch bitmaps.  FM scrolls
through them very quickly.

My colleagues import 300 pixels / inch jpgs.  Their jpgs are better
quality but FM works very very slowly when scrolling past a page with
a jpg.

I just imported a PDF-ed graphic that was made from a 600 pixels /
inch jpg.  It has the best resolution and FM scrolls through the page
very quickly.

So here's my question:  is there any downside to using the PDF-ed graphic?

We PDF these documents and send them to the customer, who does who
know what to them.  We may in the future be turning these documents
into HTML documents.

I don't know jack about graphics, so any help would be most appreciated.

Deirdre