New Adobe Technical Communication Suite 2 andnewAdobeeLearningSuite

[Alan Litchfield]

And, Acrobat Pro allows you  to merge the comments together into one  
pdf.

Alan

On 23/01/2009, at 11:36 AM, Art Campbell wrote:

> The web server option is just that -- a option. Not required.
>
> If you don't use the (free, for now) adobe.com option, you can use  
> any LAN
> network folder that allows all reviewers r/w access as the base  
> location for
> the review.
>
> Art
>
> Art Campbell
>         art.campbell at gmail.com
> "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52  
> Vincent and a
> redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
>                                                     No disclaimers  
> apply.
>                                                              DoD 358
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Fred Ridder <docudoc at hotmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Responding to Leif Erikson, Richard Combs wrote:
>>
>>> You need Pro or Pro Extended to create a PDF that reviewers can  
>>> mark up
>>> with Adobe Reader. The version comparison matrix is at:
>>>
>>> http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/matrix.html
>>
>> It's my understanding that what you need the Pro Extended version for
>> is to implement the shared browser-based review using Acrobat.com
>> and avoiding the hassle of setting up your own web server with the
>> (very expensive) Acrobat server extensions software. And the  
>> advantage
>> of the browser-based review workflow over one that uses a file server
>> is that each reviewer's markup gets merged into the master review  
>> file
>> so that all reviewers see all previous markup/comments.
>>
>> -Fred Ridder
>>
>> _