Graphics average weight
Stuart Rogers
srogers at phoenix-geophysics.com
Thu Oct 21 14:27:36 PDT 2010
On 21/10/2010 4:14 PM, mathieu jacquet wrote:
>
> Thank you Art,
>
> No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
>
> Best regards,
> Mathieu
>
>> From: art.campbell at gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
>> To: bobitch at hotmail.com
>> CC: generic668 at yahoo.ca; framers at lists.frameusers.com; richard.combs at polycom.com
>>
>> Are you optimizing / reducing the size of the PDF with Acrobat after
>> you generate it?
Mathieu,
Have a look at this presentation for recommendations on Job Options
(p. 65 and on), especially for graphics settings:
http://www.planetpdf.com/planetpdf/pdfs/pdf2k/01W/isaacs_reliablepdfcreation.pdf
(or http://tinyurl.com/bz2yg )
You might also consider Shlomo Perets's articles:
http://www.microtype.com/PDFBestPractices.html
There are a number of things that can increase PDF file size. Your
content of mostly screenshot .pngs (which are generally small files)
suggests that graphics may not be at fault in your situation. For
example, if you turn on Named Destinations for all paragraphs in FM's
PDF setup, your PDF file size may become significantly larger. That's
where the suggestions by Art & Richard (optimizing, using Save As to the
same name) can work to reduce bloat, by eliminating unused destination
information.
HTH,
--
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
3781 Victoria Park Avenue, Unit 3
Toronto, ON, Canada M1W 3K5
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325
http://www.phoenix-geophysics.com
More information about the framers
mailing list