Graphics average weight

Stuart Rogers srogers at phoenix-geophysics.com
Thu Oct 21 14:27:36 PDT 2010


On 21/10/2010 4:14 PM, mathieu jacquet wrote:
>
> Thank you Art,
>
> No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
>
> Best regards,
> Mathieu
>
>> From: art.campbell at gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
>> To: bobitch at hotmail.com
>> CC: generic668 at yahoo.ca; framers at lists.frameusers.com; richard.combs at polycom.com
>>
>> Are you optimizing / reducing the size of the PDF with Acrobat after
>> you generate it?


Mathieu,

Have a look at this presentation for recommendations on Job Options
(p. 65 and on), especially for graphics settings:

http://www.planetpdf.com/planetpdf/pdfs/pdf2k/01W/isaacs_reliablepdfcreation.pdf

(or http://tinyurl.com/bz2yg )

You might also consider Shlomo Perets's articles:
http://www.microtype.com/PDFBestPractices.html

There are a number of things that can increase PDF file size.  Your 
content of mostly screenshot .pngs (which are generally small files) 
suggests that graphics may not be at fault in your situation.  For 
example, if you turn on Named Destinations for all paragraphs in FM's 
PDF setup, your PDF file size may become significantly larger.  That's 
where the suggestions by Art & Richard (optimizing, using Save As to the 
same name) can work to reduce bloat, by eliminating unused destination 
information.

HTH,

-- 
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
3781 Victoria Park Avenue, Unit 3
Toronto, ON, Canada  M1W 3K5
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

http://www.phoenix-geophysics.com



More information about the framers mailing list