Methods to redo book
Les Smalley
l_c_smalley at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 13 19:37:24 PDT 2011
Do you mean there are hundreds of references going between files within the one book, or going between files in different books?
If the former, it's not as daunting as you may think, especially as you
have clean templates and a new book file ready. I would re-create the
book exactly in a parallel folder with empty files - just save copies of
the clean template with the desired names in the folders of your new
book directory.
Then copy the content of each of the orginal FM
files into the same-named 'chapter' in the clean book and save them.
Don't worry about cross-references until that's complete. Once
it is, you should be able to simply update the book, and as the
file names are the same, the XRefs should all resovle
properly.
The final task may be to recheck that all the content
is tagged with formats in the catalogs (paragraphs, char strings, tables
and XRefs), and of course do any tweaking needed to paginate as
you desire.
If instead there are numerous references between files in multiple
books, the process is the same but just longer... keep copying content
from old files to clean template files until everything is done, then go
back and update every book. It make take twice going through them all
to get the references resolved but still should work.
aside: FM understands more of the path data than just the current
('dot') or parent ('dot-dot') directory... it stores references as
relative paths using a unix-like dotted notation unless it crosses a
root folder of a drive, then FM switches to an absolute reference (drive
& path) notation. So you can go up four levels and then down a
new path (../../../../dir1/dir2) and FM happily follows along.
– Les
--- On Sat, 3/12/11, Steve Rickaby <srickaby at wordmongers.demon.co.uk> wrote:
At 08:31 +1300 13/3/11, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
> It may make it easier if the directory structure is the same as previous and
> with the same file
names.
Absolutely. Best to always keep a book under the same
root folder; just clone that and work on the clone. Always worked for
us. I think this is because FrameMaker stores links using Unix dot and
dot-dot notation, which means that it understands siblings and parents,
but nothing higher in the directory path.
It gets harder if you have a lot of imported files shared between books.
--
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers-frameusers.com/attachments/20110313/9d96f0af/attachment.htm>
More information about the framers
mailing list