Frame versus XSL-FO

[Ed Nodland]

These are good inputs.

The "site:" for searching was new to me.  Thanks

I think I will stay with Framemaker and upgrade to version 11.  I hope
Adobe improves the stability and UI issues as time goes on.

I am curious if the high cost of XSL-FO development is due to FO being more
difficult then basic XSLT.  We program many XSLTs, some are complex that
merge data from multiple XML files that contain coded data in tables,
tables of descriptions of the coded data, header data, etc.  XSLT becomes a
powerful programming language for text processing if it is written
recursively like the old LISP language.  I agree this can be daunting, but
maybe I could eat FO for breakfast.  I'll have to looking to it further
when due dates don't get in my way.


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Combs, Richard
<richard.combs at polycom.com>wrote:

> Harro de Jong wrote:
>
> > > Also, I could not find the search capability on frameusers.com to
> search
> > older topics
> > > by keyword other then the archive that looks like something out of the
> 90's.
> >  Am I
> > > missing some capability somewhere?
> >
> >
> > I use the search at
> > < http://www.mail-archive.com/framers@lists.frameusers.com/info.html>
>
> I use Google: <search term> site:frameusers.com
>
> Richard G. Combs
> Senior Technical Writer
> Polycom, Inc.
> richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
> 303-223-5111
> ------
> rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
> 303-903-6372
> ------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers-frameusers.com/attachments/20130227/a4192425/attachment.htm>