Updating older versions of Adobe fonts? Slightly off-topic, but related in a way!

[Robert Lauriston]

Yes, I figured that out. I believe I called Adobe tech support about
the problem, so they should be aware of it.

You're right, there's nothing wrong with the design of Adobe Pi. The
moron was whoever did the Zapf > Pi mapping in FrameMaker 8.

The UI makeover in FM9 was wrong in so many ways that it would be a
good negative example for UI design classes. Some of the people who
did the work might be competent but the people in charge are
world-class incompetents, up there with the geniuses behind OS/2,
Microsoft Bob, and Clippy.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Dov Isaacs <isaacs at adobe.com> wrote:
> Please see the response I sent out a few minutes ago. There is nothing wrong with the Adobe Pi font, but rather, there is a nasty mapping issue that should have been resolved in FrameMaker if they in fact had a .ini file setting mapping Type 1 Zapf Dingbats to Adobe Pi or any other OpenType version of Zapf Dingbats.
>
> And quite frankly, I think it is a hell of a lot of chutzpa on your part to label the designers of Adobe Pi as “morons.” The font simply follows the international specifications for both OpenType fonts and Unicode encoding. How does that make them “morons?” Likewise, you may not like the UI makeover of FrameMaker (maybe I don’t either), but that doesn’t make those who designed and implemented it “morons.”