OT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again)

[Writer]

And on the other side of the fence...

I find it an interesting discussion. And I prefer to have it on this list since I don't participate in many other lists.

Sorry, Matt, my vote is for keep it online.

Nadine

>
>Bandwidth is measured also by the number of emails one can reasonably read (and respond to) in a given length of time.
>
>
>I can't be the only person who is tired of reading about reactions to the CS licensing model on this FrameMaker forum…
>
>
>I don't know anything about Adobe's plans.
>
>
>Everyone's time is worth (and costs) something…the time required to participate and/or read these discussions thus have a cost, so I'm asking... perhaps those with a keen interest in the topic could take the discussion of it offline or to a CS-oriented list until Adobe indicates this will affect FrameMaker? 
>
>
>I'm happy to discuss this off-list, but as a courtesy, will be avoiding this thread (even more) going forward.
>
>
>-Matt
>
>
>
>On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:49 PM, "Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net)" <Syed.Hosain at aeris.net> wrote:
>
>In this day and age, is Internet “bandwidth” use for text e-mails really an issue? J
>> 
>>Plus, are you saying that you know/believe that FrameMaker is not going to be released as a cloud-based license model soon? Love to hear the news.
>> 
>>And, in my opinion, btw, my discussion (feel free to call it whining perhaps? :)) on license cost/models of FrameMaker is fair game for this mailing list …
>> 
>>Z