framers Digest, Vol 101, Issue 24

[Karen Robbins]

Does this mean that if the errant frame was the earliest created 
(ever, if copied from a previous document? or just in this 
document?), that FM encounters that frame first? Seems to contradict 
the explanation at the link below ("... adding a second container 
would place it after the existing container in the search order..."). 
If the errant frame is not in flow A, shouldn't FM encounter it after 
all of flow A? Either way, I would have expected the errant frame to 
appear at the end of the correct chapter set, not before it.

The errant frame has NO flow tag. If I connect it at the end of the 
last frame in the document, it will gain flow A status. Should I 
manually assign flow B instead? Neither would place it correctly, but 
it would at least remain under its correct chapter.

Thanks,
Karen

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:10:44 -0400, Stuart Rogers  wrote:

>Don't get confused about the position of the head1 entry in the TOC --
>just because it appears /before/ its Chapter title does not mean that FM
>is associating it with the previous chapter.  A TOC is just a file
>consisting of a long list of x-refs, formatted according to their pgf
>tags. When they appear out of the expected order in the TOC, it means
>that FM is encountering them in that order because of the way it parses
>frames and flows.
>
>Here's a long-ago post on the issue:
>
>http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/2009-June/017197.html