limiting adjectives vs possessive adjectives
Stuart Rogers
srogers at phoenix-geophysics.com
Tue Mar 17 07:28:14 PDT 2015
On 2015-Mar-16 5:42 PM, Fred Ridder wrote:
> Yes, there are restrictive [and non-restrictive] adjectives, which is
> what I assume you are referring to as "limiting adjectives" (a term I
> failed to find in any of my handy grammar/linguistics references).
>
> But I don't think that's what we are dealing with here in the
> non-possessive case, because I don't believe we're dealing with
> adjectives at all.
>
> Most people remember that adjectives modify nouns, but forget that
> they are not the *only* things that modify nouns. In some cases verbs
> modify nouns (e.g., the sitting president), and in many cases --
> particularly in technical writing -- nouns modify nouns. Nouns that
> modify nouns are referred to as "attributive nouns" or "noun
> adjuncts". They almost always appear before the noun they modify (an
> attributive or prepositive position) and they typically identify a
> property or attribute of the noun that follows rather than directly
> modifying the noun itself.
>
> The classical example of an attributive noun phrase in English is
> "chicken soup". Both words are nouns, but it is undeniable that the
> first noun modifies our understanding of what the second noun
> represents. Exactly what the relationship is varies widely; the second
> noun could be made from the first (e.g., chicken soup), intended for
> the first (e.g., user manual), composed of the first (e.g., butterfly
> migration), dependent on the first (e.g., church wedding) -- basically
> any semantic relationship other than simple possession by. And you can
> string a bunch of them together without any of the usual concerns
> about commas in adjective series. (E.g., The chicken soup tureen ladle
> handle was covered with schmaltz.)
>
> Both "user manual" and "butterfly migration" fit this pattern. Both
> "user" and "butterfly" are nouns that modify the sense of the nouns
> that follow them. And they are unlike adjectives because they cannot
> be used predicatively.
>
> -FR
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Fred wins the Internet again!
--
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
3781 Victoria Park Avenue, Unit 3
Toronto, ON, Canada M1W 3K5
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325
http://www.phoenix-geophysics.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers-frameusers.com/attachments/20150317/88946f17/attachment.htm>
More information about the framers
mailing list