[Framers] I'm pretty sure the answer is structured content

[russ at weststreetconsulting.com]

Fine, you all can have the last word. I know better than to continue
this debate. I should have known better than to even start it.

Russ

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:58:29 -0700
From: Robert Lauriston <robert at lauriston.com>
To: "framers at lists.frameusers.com" 
Subject: Re: [Framers] I'm pretty sure the answer is structured
 content
Message-ID:
 <CAN3Yy4A5zr2TZURJgSnBhOuxzt6yTPfOVSUEk3aU-CR1a8YuyQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Structured markup has been around longer than the web, PDFs, online
help, or personal computers.

Since you make your living from structured content, I'm not going to
waste time explaining why it's not the best choice for every set of
requirements, and why people are still creating interesting and useful
unstructured tools.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:01 PM, <russ at weststreetconsulting.com> wrote:
> Pat, I'd like to assert that structured content is generally THE answer,
> period. Nothing interesting happens with unstructured content anymore,
> because the technology is decades old. Any technical writer in a
> high-demand environment should be using structured content. If you are
> not, you are now closer to the typewriter than you are to modern
> practices. ...


------------------------------