[Framers] Feature comparison list Framemaker 9 vs. FrameMaker 2015

[Syed Zaeem Hosain]

Scott, I agree entirely with your comment. FM 9 was not a good release at all!

Indeed, I would step back to version 8 (or even 7.2, I could live with its lack of some capabilities) if I was forced to use version 9 again for some reason. It crashed often and easily!

Version 10 did not improve much. FM 11 was better, and 12 has been stable. I am not using FM 2015 since I consider the upgrade pricing to have gotten way out of hand - my flow is now LaTeX-based as a direct result.

Z

-----Original Message-----
From: Framers [mailto:framers-bounces+syed.hosain=aeris.net at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Scott Prentice
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 09:19 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: [Framers] Feature comparison list Framemaker 9 vs. FrameMaker 2015

Not aware of such a list.

If you're trying to convince someone to upgrade, here's my list ..

- FM9 was the *worst* version of FM ever produced. (First version with the new GUI, and much was broken. It's gotten better with each successive release, making FM2015 significantly better and more stable than FM9.)

Cheers!
...scott

On 10/10/16 7:41 AM, Yves Barbion wrote:
> Hi group
>
> I'm looking for a feature comparison list between Framemaker 9 and 
> FrameMaker 2015.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks