[Framers] Up for discussion: changing Framers' default Reply-To behavior

[Johan Anglemark]

I agree with Alan on all counts. I much prefer Reply-to-sender, for the 
reasons he gives, but I can live with whatever you decide.

Best,

Johan

On 2017-01-26 20:23, Alan Houser wrote:
> I _much_ prefer a default "Reply-To-Sender". Reasons:
>
> - A default Reply-To-All is noisy. (I'll note that Carol suggested that
> we reply privately to her. Why is this thread special?  :-> ).
>
> - A default Reply-To-All _will_ cause private or embarrassing messages
> to go to the list, from senders who use it accidentally.
>
> - If one accidentally replies only to the sender, that's easy to fix.
> Just send the message again to the list. But it's impossible to retract
> a private or embarrassing response sent to the list. There's no "undo"
> for an unintentional "Reply-To-List".
>
> Having said that, I'm grateful that this list continues (thanks,
> Carol!), regardless of admin settings or ground rules.
>
> -Alan

-- 
Johan Anglemark, Technical Communicator & Localization Manager.
IAR Systems AB
Box 23051, Strandbodgatan 1
SE-750 23 Uppsala, SWEDEN
Mobile: +46 708 651088, Phone: +46 18 167894, Fax: +46 18 167838
E-mail: johan.anglemark at iar.com Website: www.iar.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/iarsystems