Frame's future

[quills at airmail.net]

Its as valid as any officer of a company doing something for worse 
reasons. His justification may not be exemplary, however it is not 
malfeasance. Since it is somewhere around the middle ground I see no 
reason to take him to task for it.

Scott

At 5:38 AM -0800 3/1/07, John Posada wrote:
>  > Considering how most companies spend their money on
>>  the latest fad, or hot idea that the V.P. in charge
>>  suddenly is convinced is the way to go (usually without
>>  much real investigation), I don't see what the problem is.
>
>and this is a legitimate and credible justification?
>
>>  easier for us, I don't really see that there is a rush to real
>>  cost-effectiveness. Why not look around for alternatives?
>
>Because it's the right way to do it and I like to look at my face in
>the miror.
>
>John Posada
>Senior Technical Writer
>
>"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've 
>never actually known what the question is."